This message is only visible to admins.
Problem displaying Facebook posts. Backup cache in use.
Click to show error
Problem displaying Facebook posts. Backup cache in use.
Click to show error
Error: Error validating access token: The session has been invalidated because the user changed their password or Facebook has changed the session for security reasons. Type: OAuthException
Rekognisi….![]()
regional.kompas.com/read/2019/02/17/07500711/ancam-warisan-leluhur-warga-baduy-tolak-dana-desa-rp…
Ancam Warisan Leluhur, Warga Baduy Tolak Dana Desa Rp 2,5 Miliar – Kompas.com
regional.kompas.com
Warga Baduy menolak bantuan desa sebesar Rp 2,5 miliar dari pemerintah pusat. Alasannya, dana tersebut akan mengancam warisan budaya leluhur.
Beginilah hipotesis revolusi hijau itu ternyata……![]()
Norman Borlaug hypothesis
Borlaug continually advocated increasing crop yields as a means to curb deforestation. The large role he played in both increasing crop yields and promoting this view has led to this methodology being called by agricultural economists the "Borlaug hypothesis", namely that increasing the productivity of agriculture on the best farmland can help control deforestation by reducing the demand for new farmland. According to this view, assuming that global food demand is on the rise, restricting crop usage to traditional low-yield methods would also require at least one of the following: the world population to decrease, either voluntarily or as a result of mass starvations; or the conversion of forest land into crop land. It is thus argued that high-yield techniques are ultimately saving ecosystems from destruction. On a global scale, this view holds strictly true ceteris paribus, if deforestation only occurs to increase land for agriculture. But other land uses exist, such as urban areas, pasture, or fallow, so further research is necessary to ascertain what land has been converted for what purposes, to determine how true this view remains. Increased profits from high-yield production may also induce cropland expansion in any case, although as world food needs decrease, this expansion may decrease as well.![]()
Criticisms and his view of critics
Borlaug’s name is nearly synonymous with the Green Revolution, against which many criticisms have been mounted over the decades by environmentalists and some nutritionalists. Throughout his years of research, Borlaug’s programs often faced opposition by people who consider genetic crossbreeding to be unnatural or to have negative effects. Borlaug’s work has been criticized for bringing large-scale monoculture, input-intensive farming techniques to countries that had previously relied on subsistence farming.These farming techniques often reap large profits for U.S. agribusiness and agrochemical corporations and have been criticized for widening social inequality in the countries owing to uneven food distribution while forcing a capitalist agenda of U.S. corporations onto countries that had undergone land reform.![]()
Other concerns of his critics and critics of biotechnology in general include: that the construction of roads in populated third-world areas could lead to the destruction of wilderness; the crossing of genetic barriers; the inability of crops to fulfill all nutritional requirements; the decreased biodiversity from planting a small number of varieties; the environmental and economic effects of inorganic fertilizer and pesticides; the amount of herbicide sprayed on fields of herbicide-resistant crops.![]()
Borlaug dismissed most claims of critics, but did take certain concerns seriously. He stated that his work has been "a change in the right direction, but it has not transformed the world into a Utopia". Of environmental lobbyists he stated, "some of the environmental lobbyists of the Western nations are the salt of the earth, but many of them are elitists. They’ve never experienced the physical sensation of hunger. They do their lobbying from comfortable office suites in Washington or Brussels. If they lived just one month amid the misery of the developing world, as I have for fifty years, they’d be crying out for tractors and fertilizer and irrigation canals and be outraged that fashionable elitists back home were trying to deny them these things".
Woles aja. Kerjakan dan majukan lebih baik aja 😀![]()
m.detik.com/news/berita/d-4042347/hasil-olahan-limbah-tinja-pd-pal-jaya-bening-dan-tak-berbau
Hasil Olahan Limbah Tinja PD PAL Jaya Bening dan Tak Berbau
m.detik.com
Hasil pengolahan limbah tinja menggunakan teknologi PAL-Andrich Tech System bukanlah air yang bisa diminum. Nah, seperti apa sebenarnya wujudnya?Lahan, Deforestasi dan Pembangunan
www.facebook.com
Idenya asik, pas banget disana….![]()
mobile.nytimes.com/2018/05/13/world/australia/an-australian-environmentalists-next-act-frugal-hed…
An Australian Environmentalist’s Next Act: ‘Frugal Hedonism’
mobile.nytimes.com
David Holmgren, who decades ago encouraged homeowners to turn their backyards into gardens, is now calling for suburbanites to go further off the grid.